Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Global Pressure Pumping market in Oil and Gas industry to grow at a CAGR of 14.6% over the period 2014-2019, finds new report

Global Pressure Pumping Market in Oil and Gas Industry 2015-2019

Pressure pumping services increase access to the proven reserves, improve the asset value, ROI, and reservoir yield and integrity. They are generally used in maturing reservoirs or places where oil extraction conditions are challenging. The ever-increasing demand for oil and gas has led to a shift toward EOR. This has led to increased activities in unconventional gas plays, which utilize advanced techniques to enhance the reservoir recovery. Hence, pressure pumping has been gaining traction in the market due to increased process complexity of oil and gas exploration.

Publisher's analysts forecast the Global Pressure Pumping market in Oil and Gas industry to grow at a CAGR of 14.6 percent over the period 2014-2019.

According to the report, one of the main drivers in this market is the increase in global oil and gas demand. As a result of the increased E&P of oil and gas, many industries worldwide are adopting this technology.

The Global Pressure Pumping market in Oil and Gas industry can be divided into three segments based on applications: Hydraulic Fracturing, Cementing, and Others.

Global Pressure Pumping Market in Oil and Gas Industry 2015-2019, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers the Americas, and the EMEA and APAC regions; it also covers the Global Pressure Pumping market landscape in the Oil and Gas industry and its growth prospects in the coming years. The report also includes a discussion of the key vendors operating in this market.

Key Regions
  • Americas
  • APAC
  • EMEA


Key Vendors
  • Baker Hughes
  • Halliburton
  • National Oil Varco
  • Schlumberger
  • Weatherford International


Other Prominent Vendors
  • Calfrac Well Services
  • Frac Tech Services
  • Sanjel
  • Trican


Market Driver
  • Increase in Global Oil and Gas Demand
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report


Market Challenge
  • Shortfall in Oil Companies' Revenue Generation
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report


Market Trend
  • Emergence of Intelligent Pump Systems
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report


Key Questions Answered in this Report
  • What will the market size be in 2019 and what will the growth rate be?
  • What are the key market trends?
  • What is driving this market?
  • What are the challenges to market growth?
  • Who are the key vendors in this market space?
  • What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the key vendors?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the key vendors?


Spanning over 64 pages, Global Pressure Pumping Market in Oil and Gas Industry 2015-2019” report covering the Executive Summary, List of Abbreviations, Scope of the Report, Market Research Methodology, Introduction, Market Landscape, Market Segmentation by Application, Geographical Segmentation, Key Leading Countries, Buying Criteria, Market Growth Drivers, Drivers and their Impact, Market Challenges, Impact of Drivers and Challenges, Market Trends, Trends and their Impact, Vendor Landscape, Key Vendor Analysis. The report covered companies are – Baker Hughes, Halliburton, National Oil Varco, Schlumberger, Weatherford International, Calfrac Well Services, Frac Tech Services, Sanjel, Trican

For further information on this report, please visit- http://mrr.cm/4ib

Find all Electricity Transmission and Smart Grids Reports at:

Global Polysilicon market to grow at a CAGR of 17.2% over the period 2014-2019, finds new report

Global Polysilicon Market 2015-2019

Polysilicon is the purest form of silicon and the second most abundant element available in nature. It is used as a feedstock material in most solar energy applications. The processing of polysilicon is the initial step in the manufacture of silicon-based solar PV equipment. Apart from its usage in the PV industry, polysilicon is also extensively used in the Semiconductor industry for the manufacture of electronic-grade semiconductor products. Currently, the major part of the revenue of the Global Polysilicon market is generated from the PV industry.

Publisher's analysts forecast the Global Polysilicon market to grow at a CAGR of 17.2 percent over the period 2014-2019.

According to the report, one of the major drivers in this market is the growth in new PV installations, attributed to the increased consumption of solar energy worldwide. The increased consumption of solar energy worldwide has a positive influence on the demand for polysilicon, which is expected to continue during the remaining years of the forecast period of 2014-2019.

The Global Polysilicon market can be segmented into three divisions by purity grade: Electronic Grade, Medium Grade, and Upgraded Metallurgical Grade. The market is divided into two segments by end-user types: PV Industry and Semi-conductor Industry.

Global Polysilicon Market 2015-2019, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers the Americas, and the EMEA and APAC regions; it also covers the Global Polysilicon market landscape and its growth prospects in the coming years. The report also includes a discussion of the key vendors operating in this market.

Key Regions
  • Americas
  • APAC
  • EMEA


Key Vendors
  • GCL-Poly Energy
  • Hemlock Semiconductor
  • OCI
  • Wacker Chemie


Other Prominent Vendors
  • AE Polysilicon
  • CSG Holding
  • Daqo New Energy
  • KCC
  • LDK Solar
  • MEMC Electronic Materials
  • PV Crystalox
  • Renewable Energy
  • Tokuyama
  • Woongjin Polysilicon


Market Driver
  • Increase in Solar Energy Consumption
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report


Market Challenge
  • Fluctuating Prices
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report


Market Trend
  • Decrease in Production Cost
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report


Key Questions Answered in this Report
  • What will the market size be in 2019 and what will the growth rate be?
  • What are the key market trends?
  • What is driving this market?
  • What are the challenges to market growth?
  • Who are the key vendors in this market space?
  • What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the key vendors?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the key vendors?


Spanning over 64 pages, Global Polysilicon Market 2015-2019” report covering the Executive Summary, List of Abbreviations, Scope of the Report, Market Research Methodology, Introduction, Market Landscape, Market Segmentation by Grade, Market Segmentation by End-users, Geographical Segmentation, Key Leading Countries, Buying Criteria, Market Growth Drivers, Drivers and their Impact, Market Challenges, Impact of Drivers and Challenges, Market Trends, Trends and their Impact, Vendor Landscape, Key Vendor Analysis. The report covered companies are – GCL-Poly Energy, Hemlock Semiconductor, OCI, Wacker Chemie, AE Polysilicon , CSG Holding, Daqo New Energy , KCC , LDK Solar, MEMC Electronic Materials, PV Crystalox, Renewable Energy, Tokuyama , Woongjin Polysilicon

For further information on this report, please visit- http://mrr.cm/4iL

Find all Energy and Utilities Reports at: http://www.marketresearchreports.com/energy-utilities

Monday, 2 February 2015

Global Bio-ketones Market to grow at a CAGR of 6.86% over the period 2014-2019, finds new report

Global Bio-ketones Market 2015-2019

Bio-ketones are a type of organic compounds which possess important physiological properties which are produced from bio-based raw materials, herby making it environment-friendly. Bio-ketones are majorly used as solvents in the paint and coating sector, as preservatives, and in hydraulic fluids.

Publisher's analysts forecast the Global Bio-ketones Market to grow at a CAGR of 6.86 percent over the period 2014-2019

The Global Bio-ketones market can be segmented into three divisions: Bio-MEK, Bio-PEEK, Bio-acetone, and Others. These are sets of methodologies and technologies that transform unstructured and structured data into meaningful and useful information processes.

According to the report, one of the key drivers contributing to the growth of the Global Bio-ketones market is the scarcity of non-renewable resources such as crude oil. Bio-based production of chemicals is replacing the traditional petroleum-based production of chemicals because of rising crude oil prices.

The Global Bio-ketones market 2015-2019, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers APAC, North America and Europe region; it also covers the Global Bio-ketones market landscape and its growth prospects in the coming years. The report also includes a discussion of the key vendors operating in this market.

Key Regions
  • APAC
  • North America
  • Europe


Key Vendors
  • BASF
  • Eastman Chemicals
  • Solvay Specialty Polymers


Other Prominent Vendors
  • Greenchem Industries
  • Lanzatech


Market Driver
  • Scarcity of Non-renewable Resources
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report.


Market Challenge
  • Availability of Raw Materials
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report.


Market Trend
  • Huge Growth from Emerging Economies
  • For a full, detailed list, view our report.


Key Questions Answered in this Report
  • What will the market size be in 2019 and what will the growth rate be?
  • What are the key market trends?
  • What is driving this market?
  • What are the challenges to market growth?
  • Who are the key vendors in this market space?
  • What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the key vendors?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the key vendors?


Spanning over 65 pages, Global Bio-ketones Market 2015-2019” report covering the Executive Summary, List of Abbreviations, Scope of the Report, Market Research Methodology, Introduction, Market Landscape, Global Bio-ketones Market, Market Segmentation by Application, Global Bio-ketones Market by Type, Geographical Segmentation, Key Leading Countries, Buying Criteria, Market Growth Drivers, Drivers and their Impact, Market Challenges, Impact of Drivers and Challenges, Market Trends, Trends and their Impact, Vendor Landscape, Key Vendor Analysis. The report covered companies are - BASF, Eastman Chemicals, Solvay Specialty Polymers , Greenchem Industries, Lanzatech

For further information on this report, please visit- http://mrr.cm/4iT

Find all Energy and Utilities Reports at: http://www.marketresearchreports.com/energy-utilities

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

The Future of Carbon Capture and Storage: Technology Evolution, Costs and Future Outlook, New Report Launched

The Future of Carbon Capture and Storage: Technology Evolution, Costs and Future Outlook

Chapter 1 Carbon capture and storage: the potential and the challenges
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is recognized as a key technology in the fight to reduce the global emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The technology, which is well understood, can be used to remove carbon dioxide from the emissions of power plants and a range of industrial plants that burn fossil fuel. However the development of commercial CCS technology for power plants and industrial facilities remains perilously slow. Europe, which was expected to drive forward the technology with a series of early demonstration plants has failed to do so because of financial constraints within government and industry, and the USA is now taking the lead. International organizations such as the IEA are lobbying for greater incentives to develop the technology, which needs to be available commercially by 2020 if it is to play a role in limiting the global temperature rise to 2°C. Meanwhile the greatest need for CCS is expected to be within developing nations such as China and India.

Chapter 2 Carbon capture technologies and developments
Carbon dioxide is a major product of the combustion of coal, oil and natural gas. The biggest source is coal and coal-fired power plants offer the single best target for applying carbon capture technologies to reduce global emissions. There are three primary methods of carbon dioxide capture being developed today, post-combustion capture, pre-combustion capture and oxyfuel combustion. A fourth, chemical looping, is in an early development stage. Post combustion capture involves scrubbing flue gases from a power plant to remove carbon dioxide. This is already carried out industrially and post combustion capture offers the best method of retro-fitting capture to existing plants. Oxyfuel combustion is another form of post-combustion capture in which the fossil is burnt in oxygen, leading to a carbon dioxide rich fuel gas from which it can easily be separated. However it has not been tested at the scale of a major power plant. Pre-combustion capture is based on the gasification of coal followed by removal of carbon dioxide to leave hydrogen which can be used to generate power, often in an integrated gasification combined cycle plant. All the stages of a pre-combustion plant have been operated but not together. Demonstration plants to establish all these technologies are now needed urgently to commercialize the technology.

Chapter 3 Carbon dioxide transportation and storage: the options
The transportation and sequestration of carbon dioxide are key elements of any overall strategy for carbon capture and storage (CCS). The pipeline transportation of carbon dioxide has been carried out extensively in the USA and elsewhere for enhanced oil recovery and the technology is available today. However underground storage of carbon dioxide has only been demonstrated to a limited extent. Moreover, the development of carbon storage sites can take five to ten years according to the International Energy Agency so development is necessary now if sites are to be ready for commercialization of CCS in the third decade of the century. Oil and gas wells can be used for sequestration and these offer the cheapest initial sequestration options but for large scale storage underground brine aquifers are the only geological structure capable of providing the necessary global capacity. Alongside the development of these storage sites, extensive pipeline networks will be needed. Business models will be needed to encourage investment in transportation and storage and this will have to be supported by legislation and regulation to ensure both safe and equitable use of networks and storage.

Chapter 4 The cost of carbon capture and storage
The cost of carbon capture and storage can be broken down into elements relating to the capture of carbon dioxide and those related to the transportation and storage of the gas, once isolated. The breakdown shows that the capital cost of carbon capture is the most significant part of the initial outlay. The cost of pipelines and to develop storage sites is likely to cost less in initial investment, but overall lifetime costs will be significant and could account for between 10% and 30% of the cost for each tonne of carbon dioxide sequestered based on the technology available today. The effect of adding carbon capture and storage to a power plant is to increase the cost of electricity from the plant. Increases are likely to be between 25% for a natural gas-fired plant to 40% for a coal plant according to the International Energy Agency. Both capital cost and levelized cost of electricity increases represent a significant hurdle preventing the expansion of carbon capture and storage. Technology development could bring costs down but this depends on the technology being implemented widely.

Chapter 5 The prospects for carbon capture and storage
Carbon capture and storage has the potential to transform the battle to control carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels. The use of these fuels will continue to expand at least until the middle of the century. In power generation there will be major growth in the use of coal in developing countries, particularly China and India while natural gas use for power generation will expand in the developed world. The cost of adding carbon capture and storage to a power plant is an increase in the levelized cost of energy from the plant. This will make electricity from fossil fuel power plants more expensive than from some other sources such as wind power. Development can reduce this penalty but today the investment needed to reduce costs is not being made. If the technology can be brought to commercial viability then there is a massive market for carbon capture and storage technology over the next four decades. Failure to develop the technology will ultimately reduce demand for coal and natural gas for power generation more quickly as they are replaced by cleaner sources.

Key features of this report
  • Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage technology costs, concepts, drivers and components.
  • Insight relating to the most innovative technologies and potential areas of opportunity for manufacturers.
  • Examination of the key Carbon Capture and Storage technologies costs.
  • Identification of the key trends shaping the market, as well as an evaluation of emerging trends that will drive innovation moving forward.


Key benefits from reading this report
  • Realize up to date competitive intelligence through a comprehensive cost analysis in Carbon Capture and Storage markets.
  • Assess Carbon Capture and Storage costs and analysis - including Carbon Capture and Storage rollout costs and Carbon Capture and Storage cost-benefit ratios.
  • Identify which key trends will offer the greatest growth potential and learn which technology trends are likely to allow greater market impact.
  • Quantify cost trends and how these vary regionally.


Key findings of this report
1. Average Carbon Capture and Storage roll-out costs.
2. Annual growth value of Carbon Capture and Storage.
3. Forecasts of Carbon Capture and Storage value growth.
4. Carbon Capture and Storage cost breakdown.
5. Past, current and future Carbon Capture and Storage investment requirements.
6. Global and regional investment breakdown.
7. Carbon Capture and Storage investments plans by country.

Key questions answered by this report
1. What are the drivers shaping and influencing power plant development in the electricity industry?
2. What is Carbon Capture and Storage going to cost?
3. Which Carbon Capture and Storage technology types will be the winners and which the losers?
4. Which Carbon Capture and Storage technologies are likely to find favour with manufacturers moving forward?
5. Which emerging technologies are gaining in popularity and why?

Who this report is for
Power utility strategists, energy analysts, research managers, power sector manufacturers, Carbon Capture and Storage power developers, investors in renewables systems and infrastructure, renewable energy developers, energy/power planning managers, energy/power development managers, governmental organisations, system operators, companies investing in renewable power infrastructure and generation, investment banks, infrastructure developers and investors, intergovernmental lenders, energy security analysts.

Why buy it
  • To utilise in-depth assessment and analysis of the current and future technological and market state of Carbon Capture and Storage, carried out by an industry expert with 30 years in the power generation industry.
  • Use cutting edge information and data.
  • Use the highest level of research carried out.
  • Expert analysis to say what is happening in the market and what will happen next.
  • Have the 'what if' questions answered about new Carbon Capture and Storage technologies.
  • Save time and money by having top quality research done for you at a low cost.


Spanning over 92 pages, The Future of Carbon Capture and Storage: Technology Evolution, Costs and Future Outlook” report covering the Executive summary, Carbon capture and storage: the potential and the challenges, Carbon capture technologies and developments, Carbon dioxide transportation and storage: the options, The cost of carbon capture and storage, The prospects for carbon capture and storage.

Know more about this report athttp://mrr.cm/4wQ

Find all Energy and Utilities Reports at: http://www.marketresearchreports.com/energy-utilities

The Future Cost of Power Generation: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), power economics and the balance between conventional and renewable technologies, New Report Launched

The Future Cost of Power Generation: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), power economics and the balance between conventional and renewable technologies

Chapter 1 Electricity and fuel cost trends: the signature of the past and signs for the future

The power generation and supply industries are facing unparalleled changes as renewable generating technologies are promoted to reduce atmospheric carbon emissions, challenging the dominance of fossil fuel based technologies in the process. Grid operation is beginning to change to accommodate these new resources and the structure of grid systems is beginning to fragment as distributed generation grows. Meanwhile a revolution in oil and gas production in the USA is having ramifications for gas and coal costs that has already spread to other regions. Even so, fossil fuel generation, primarily based on coal, still dominates global generation. However this is much more pronounced in the developing world than in the developed where renewable generation is growing faster than other types. The Asia-Pacific region now has the largest global electricity production, followed by Europe and then North America. Global fuel prices have been rising everywhere during the past decade although shale oil and gas has led to a fall in gas prices in the USA in the past two years. In most regions coal is the cheapest fuel if it is available. Electricity costs have followed or exceeded fuel prices in their rises and domestic consumers have been penalized more than other groups in recent years, suggesting that this group is being unfairly treated in a market-driven electricity sector.

Chapter 2 The capital cost of power generation technologies

The capital cost of a power plant is, along with the cost of fuel, one of the key determinants of the cost of electricity. Capital cost trends are therefore one of the most important indicators of the changing balance between different technologies. For renewable technologies the capital cost is the main cost determinant since there is no fuel cost. Renewable plants generally have lower capacity factors than conventional and nuclear plants and this must also be taken into account when assessing overall economic performance. The cheapest type of power plant from a capital cost perspective is a gas turbine based station. The gas turbine is a globally traded commodity and price competition is fierce. Best of all is a combined cycle plant which is both cheap and highly efficient. A typical pulverised coal fired plant will cost almost twice as much as the combined cycle plant. Adding carbon capture and storage pushes the prices of both up but adds relatively more to the cost of the combined cycle plant than it does to the coal plant. Of the main renewable technologies, hydropower and onshore wind are more expensive than a gas turbine plant but cheaper than a coal plant. Solar photovoltaic costs are higher than either fossil fuel based technology although costs are falling rapidly. Solar thermal generation is more costly still. All these costs vary regionally depending on local labour costs and the need to import sophisticated components and this can affect the balance between technologies.

Chapter 3 The future cost of electricity: the levelized cost of power from conventional, nuclear and renewable technologies

In order to identify the best technology for a given power development, one of the key determining factors will be the cost of electricity from the plant. To determine the future cost of power an economic model called the levelized cost of electricity model is used. When this modelling is carried out the cheapest source of power in the USA is a combined cycle power plant burning natural gas. However elsewhere nuclear and even coal-fired generation can theoretically be more cost effective. Of the main renewable technologies, hydropower can be cost effective in many parts of the world although opportunities in the developed world are scarce. Wind and solar generation are becoming increasingly competitive too and may already have reached parity in some situations. Adding carbon capture and storage to a fossil fuel power plant can push the cost of electricity from such facilities above that from the main renewable generation technologies. Meanwhile short term predictions for future costs show all the main renewable technology costs falling relative to conventional sources. There are sharp variations in the cost of electricity from plants in different regions of the world. These reflect both differing market conditions and in some cases the effects of subsidies.

Chapter 4 Global electricity generating capacity and the cost of power: technology growth trends and prospects

The production of electricity will double, globally over the next thirty years. Much of this growth will take place in the developing world but there will be some increase in capacity within the developed world too. Trends differ between the two groups however with fossil fuel production continuing to grow in the developing world while across the developed world there is a more pronounced shift towards renewable generation. In both regions, however, natural gas will become increasingly popular for power generation too and this could accelerate if oil and gas from shale deposits is exploited in regions other than the USA. Meanwhile most of the growth in coal-based generation will be found in China and India. How fast renewable generation will increase depends on a range of factors and predictions differ from a doubling of capacity by 2030 to an increase of more than ten times. The shift towards renewables is already beginning to change the role of conventional power plants such as combined cycle facilities which will have to offer grid support roles in the future. At the same time predictions of future electricity costs show costs from the main renewable sources falling relative to conventional generation sources. More global financial investment is now flowing into renewable generation than into conventional generation. Whether this will continue and how overall investment will hold up may depend on developments in developing world countries that have profited from the global crisis but may now be starting to suffer as markets elsewhere show signs of recovery.

Spanning over 123 pages, The Future Cost of Power Generation: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), power economics and the balance between conventional and renewable technologies” report covering the Executive summary, Electricity and fuel cost trends: the signature of the past and signs for the future, The capital cost of power generation technologies, The future cost of electricity: the levelized cost of power from conventional, nuclear and renewable technologies, Global electricity generating capacity and the cost of power: technology growth trends and prospects

Know more about this report athttp://mrr.cm/4wM

Find all Electricity Reports at: http://www.marketresearchreports.com/electricity

The Future Cost of Solar PV Power: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), economics, costs and future outlook for solar photovoltaic power generation, New Report Launched

The Future Cost of Solar PV Power: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), economics, costs and future outlook for solar photovoltaic power generation

Chapter 1. The economics of solar cells
Solar cell costs have fallen rapidly over the past four to five years, and this has led to the technology becoming more competitive, in turn leading to cuts in subsidies for solar photovoltaic installations. With the cost and value of solar energy in flux, the US state of Minnesota has recently introduced a new, transparent approach to solar pricing that could for the benchmark for solar tariffs. The underlying capital cost of a solar PV installation depends in part on the type of installation - with small residential rooftop installations costing more than large utility installations. Costs also vary from country to country, with variations depending on a number of elements that are not intrinsically a part of the actual solar installation. In particular, the cost of rooftop installation in Germany is significantly lower than the same installation in the USA. It seems likely that installation costs are widely below US$3/W. The low cost of solar photovoltaic installations means that the cost of the electricity they produce has also fallen. For domestic rooftop installations, this cost is now below the cost of electricity from the grid in a number of important markets.

Chapter 2. Future market and economic prospects for solar cells
The market for solar cells has shifted away from Europe, the main driver for the past decade, towards Asia and the Asia Pacific region. However the market is also broadening and growth can be expected in many parts of the world - that have previously not shown a strong take up. This is being driven by the competitiveness of solar photovoltaic technology - which can now compete in some areas without any subsidies. This will come in spite of an expected stabilization of the cost of solar modules. On one prediction, the size of the solar market, globally, will reach 100GW by 2018. Over the longer term, estimates for the amount of electricity that might be supplied globally by solar cells varies between 0.6% and 4% by 2035. In Europe it already supplied 3% of total electricity demand. Important regional markets include China, Japan, the USA, Australia, and Mexico. The development of new financial vehicles that attract private sector investment for solar installations could help lower the cost of financing solar photovoltaic projects, potentially leading to further cost reductions.

Key features of this report
  • Analysis of solar PV power generation technology costs
  • Assessment of electricity costs for different technologies in terms of the two fundamental yardsticks used for cost comparison, capital cost and the levelized cost of electricity.
  • Examination of the key solar PV power generation technologies costs.


Key benefits from reading this report
  • Realize up to date competitive intelligence through a comprehensive power cost analysis in solar PV power generation markets.
  • Assess solar PV power generation costs and analysis – including capital costs, overnight costs, and levelized costs.
  • Quantify capital and levelized cost trends and how these vary regionally.


Key findings of this report
1. In March 2014, German modules were priced at €0.68/W and Japanese/Korean modules at €0.69/W. The continued price difference reflects a perception that Chinese modules are less robust and reliable than their competitors, but the margin is narrowing.
2. Based on an average installation cost for solar PV of US$3/W or US$3,000/kW, the technology had reached broad parity in ten states.
3. The actual cost of electricity to residential customers in the countries in the table vary from US$80/MWh in South Korea, where solar PV has not yet reached parity, to US$390/MWh in Mexico where parity is easily achieved.

Key questions answered by this report
1. What are the drivers shaping and influencing power plant development in the electricity industry?
2. What is solar PV power generation going to cost?
3. Which solar PV power generation technology types will be the winners and which the losers in terms of power generated, cost and viability?

Spanning over 42 pages, The Future Cost of Solar PV Power: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), economics, costs and future outlook for solar photovoltaic power generation” report covering the Executive summary, The economics of solar cells, Future market and economic prospects for solar cells.

Know more about this report athttp://mrr.cm/4wg

Find all Solar Power Reports at: http://www.marketresearchreports.com/solar-power

The Future Cost of Wind Power: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), economics, costs and future outlook for wind power generation, New Report Launched

The Future Cost of Wind Power: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), economics, costs and future outlook for wind power generation

Chapter 1 The economics of wind power
Wind power is capital intensive with most of the investment required upfront. The largest capital cost component is the turbine itself which can account for between 40% and 80% of the total capital cost of an onshore wind installation. Costs offshore are higher because of the more expensive operating environment and the greater difficulty establishing a foundation so the proportion of capital cost taken by the turbine is generally lower than onshore. Turbine cost fell from 1980 until 2002 when prices started to rise again, peaking in 2009 before falling further. Technological advances and greater overall efficiency are continuing to bring costs down. This is feeding into capital cost trends which are following turbine prices by falling. There are regional variations in capital costs, with costs lower in India and China than in Europe or the USA but regional differences are narrowing as the market becomes more global. With capital cost the dominant component of the cost of energy, the levelized cost of electricity from wind plants is falling too and onshore wind is beginning to compete with other technologies, particularly new coal. There is a growing consensus that onshore wind will reach parity in many parts of the world by the end of the decade, if not before. Offshore wind will take longer but could be competing with the main conventional sources of power by the middle or end of the third decade of the century.

Chapter 2 Future market and economic prospects for wind power generation
The cost of wind power has continued to fall compared to many other technologies over the past five years and is now approaching the level at which it can compete with conventional technologies. Power from natural gas and coal remains cheaper (without carbon capture and storage) but the steady growth in renewable penetration from both wind and wind power is leading to coal and gas-fired plants operating for less of the time, a factor which adversely affects their economics. On the other hand the low cost of wind power is leading governments to reduce subsidies to wind. By the end of the decade wind power could be the second cheapest source of electricity after natural gas in many markets. Growth of wind power is expected to continue strongly in the major markets of Europe, Asia and North America. Markets in Latin America are advancing more slowly and wind power in Africa remains a rarity.

Key features of this report
  • Analysis of wind power generation technology costs, concepts, drivers and components.
  • Assessment of electricity costs for different technologies in terms of the two fundamental yardsticks used for cost comparison, capital cost and the levelized cost of electricity.
  • Examination of the key wind power generation technologies costs.


Key benefits from reading this report
  • Realize up to date competitive intelligence through a comprehensive power cost analysis in wind power generation markets.
  • Assess wind power generation costs and analysis – including capital costs and levelized costs.
  • Quantify capital and levelized cost trends and how these vary regionally.


Key findings of this report
1. India ($1,080/kW - $1,250/kW) and China ($1,360/kW – 1,370/kW) show the lowest capital costs and the USA ($1,830/kW) and Brazil ($1,670/kW) the highest..
2. By 2014 the LCOE for a plan entering service in 2019 had fallen to $204/MWh.
3. The lowest costs recorded in the table are in India, where the LCOE ranges from $47/MWh - $113/MWh, and China where the cost is estimated to be $49/MWh - $93/MWh.
4. The range of levelized costs found for onshore wind was $75/MWh to $150/MWh.
5. Offshore wind had a range of $130/MWh – 285/MWh and large solar PV $165/MWh to $400/MWh.

Key questions answered by this report
1. What is wind power generation going to cost?
2. Which wind power generation technology types will be the winners and which the losers in terms of power generated, cost and viability?
3. Which wind power generation types are likely to find favour with manufacturers moving forward?

Who this report is for
Power utility strategists, energy analysts, research managers, power sector manufacturers, wind power developers, investors in renewables systems and infrastructure, renewable energy developers, energy/power planning managers, energy/power development managers, governmental organisations, system operators, companies investing in renewable power infrastructure and generation, investment banks, infrastructure developers and investors, intergovernmental lenders, energy security analysts.

Why buy it
  • To utilise in-depth assessment and analysis of the current and future technological and market state of wind power, carried out by an industry expert with 30 years in the power generation industry.
  • Use cutting edge information and data.
  • Use the highest level of research carried out.
  • Utilize expert analysis to say what is happening in the market and what will happen next.
  • Save time and money by having top quality research done for you at a low cost.


Spanning over 42 pages, The Future Cost of Wind Power: Capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), economics, costs and future outlook for wind power generation” report covering the Executive summary, The economics of wind power, Future market and economic prospects for wind power generation.

Know more about this report athttp://mrr.cm/4wY

Find all Wind Power Reports at: http://www.marketresearchreports.com/wind-power